|
The
single most effective way to control site cleanup costs
- by orders of magnitude - is to establish health-protective
cleanup criteria appropriate to the site and your development
plans.
Today, human health risk assessment is a crucial element
in the successful management and cleanup of sites contaminated
with hazardous waste. Health risk assessment is the
process of evaluating the potential impacts to human
health caused by exposure to hazardous chemicals. As
such, Integrated uses risk assessment to determine the
extent of cleanup needed at a given contaminated site.
By considering the site’s proposed land use, development
plans, and future occupants, the risk assessment answers
the potentially million dollar question, “How
clean is clean?”
All environmental regulations are designed to protect
human health and welfare. In the past, however, many
regulations have been interpreted to mean that during
the life cycle of a facility, any amount of hazardous
chemicals released or left behind at the site would
impact human health and the environment. In recent years,
particularly under the EPA’s Brownfield’s
initiative, health risk assessment has evolved as an
effective management tool for quantifying such impacts,
identifying cleanup alternatives, and justifying variances
or exemptions to the norm. At Integrated we often use
risk assessment in lieu of or in conjunction with remedial
actions to demonstrate that no additional action is
needed or that less stringent operational parameters
or cleanup levels are acceptable. Our realistic assessments
of site risk allow us to create practical remedial approaches
that not only protect human health and the environment,
but also decrease site cleanup costs and keep real estate
transactions and redevelopment projects on track.
For every assignment, we leverage our knowledge and
experience in risk assessment for strategic benefit.
We routinely analyze the potential health risks, costs,
and benefits of different land uses and remedial technologies
to devise the most effective remedial approach. In this
way Integrated not only protects human health but also
conserves client resources.
Integrated joins experienced professionals
with effective techniques to profile, partition and
quantify both human-health and ecological risks associated
with facility operations. In addition to assessing the
nature and magnitude of potential health risks, we identify
mitigative measures that can be implemented to manage
the risks and maximize the use of corporate resources.
With our expertise and experience
in risk characterization and risk management, we are
able to transform our client’s point of view from
that of reactive environmental compliance to one of
proactive risk-based contingency planning. In so doing,
many opportunities for improved performance and reduced
cost are created.
Risk-based planning focuses on understanding
and managing the risk in addition to managing the response.
With the findings of qualitative and quantitative risk
assessments, we can effectively prioritize remedial
strategies and identify high-risk areas that require
immediate mitigation. Such valuable information not
only enables the business owner to head off potential
environmental emergencies and disasters but also to
maintain regulatory compliance with the most effective
and efficient use of precious corporate resources to
achieve the greatest benefit. Resourceful risk-based
planning shortens the learning curve, avoids redundancies,
and keeps the team focused at all times.
Equipped with site-specific risk data
and associated mitigative measures, Integrated can then
negotiate with the regulatory agencies on cleanup levels
and devise a cost-effective compliance program for the
client.
In summary, Integrated excels in the use of health risk
assessment coupled with forward-thinking risk management
to ensure the best use of valuable resources and achieve
maximum return for the client.
-
Systematic characterization
of the nature and magnitude of risk
factors
-
Assessment, quantification,
and prioritization of these risk factors
-
Preventive and mitigative
measures for each risk driver
-
Defensible compliance
criteria that enable cost-effective
compliance or cleanup of the facility
-
Agency negotiations
based on health-based compliance and
cleanup criteria
-
Risk-based project
planning, execution, and management
-
Acceptable field
operational parameters to ensure compliance
-
Community relations
program soliciting public and agency
support based on understandable scientific
risk information and plans
|
|
|